Without a Net: Who Will Feel the Pain From Budget Cuts?
Key Takeaways
Millions of Americans are at risk of losing health care and food assistance, as a result of new work requirements and restrictions in the “big, beautiful” budget.
Article Overview
Quick insights and key information
9 min read
Estimated completion
personal finance
Article classification
July 15, 2025
09:42 PM
NerdWallet
Original publisher
Millions of Americans are now at risk of losing health care coverage or food assistance under the GOP’s recently passed mega-budget, which includes sweeping cuts and new restrictions on critical social safety net grams
Moreover, The GOP’s $3, amid market uncertainty. 3 trillion budget, dubbed the “big, beautiful bill,” includes $4. 5 trillion in tax cuts and apximately $300 billion for President Donald Trump’s defense and immigration enforcement priorities
To partly offset the steep cost, the bill targets reductions across the board — but hits health and food assistance grams hardest (which is quite significant) (noteworthy indeed), considering recent developments
Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance gram (SNAP) subsidies face deep cuts and work requirements
Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies will also be reduced
On the other hand, This demonstrates that burden of these cuts is expected to fall most heavily on existing and eligible recipients, as well as on state health grams, food banks and rural hospitals that depend on federal support to der services to vulnerable populations (something worth watching)
The timing of certain changes to social safety net grams isn’t entirely — the bill didn’t attach a specific implementation date for SNAP work requirements, for example, but it could be as early as this year
For Medicaid requirements, states have until the end of 2026 to begin enforcing, in today's market environment
And the biggest cuts to Medicaid and SNAP won’t begin until 2028 (which is quite significant), given current economic conditions
On the other hand, “We’re not all going to wake up one morning and find millions more people uninsured,” said Larry Levitt, executive vice president of health care policy for KFF, a health care policy and re organization, during a press call on July 9 (remarkable data)
Furthermore, He added that the impact of changes to Medicaid and the ACA will roll out slowly over the next decade
With gram restrictions and cuts looming, here are the people and grams who will feel the most pain
People who rely on Medicaid for health care coverageMore than 78 million people are enrolled in Medicaid in 2025, according to Medicaid
Gov, 23% of the U, in today's financial world
Additionally, They include eligible low-income adults, pregnant women, children, older adults and people with disabilities
The evidence shows demonstrates that bill's changes to Medicaid will unfold in two phases, in today's market environment
First, states must enact work requirements by the end of 2026, according to the bill, considering recent developments
To stay enrolled in Medicaid, recipients must demonstrate they are working, caring for small children, attending school or work training at least 80 hours per month
And yet, KFF finds that most people under the age of 65 who receive Medicaid are already working full-time or part-time or attending school
So it’s not lack of work or schooling that would push Medicaid enrollees off their health care coverage, it’s the complex red tape that the new requirements introduce
Nevertheless, That's, at least, how it worked when Arkansas tried to do it, considering recent developments
Nevertheless, Arkansas briefly implemented 80-hour-per-month Medicaid work requirements for enrollees ages 30 to 49, in this volatile climate
The restriction was in place from June 2018 to March 2019, when a federal court struck it down, in today's financial world
During that time, 18,000 people — 25% of the covered population — lost health care coverage, according to a September 2020 study from Harvard T, given current economic conditions
Meanwhile, Chan School of Public Health (something worth watching)
Conversely, The losses were largely due to failures in reporting or documentation, not ineligibility
Moreover, the policy had no effect on employment in the 18 months ing the end of the gram
But there were significant health and financial consequences for those who lost coverage, compared to those who remained on Medicaid: Nearly 50% reported serious medical debt blems, while 56% delayed health care and 64% delayed taking medications, both due to cost
At the highest risk for losing coverage are those with chronic illness or disabilities who cannot obtain exemptions; those with mental health conditions; and those whose work hours fluctuate from one month to the next, such as seasonal or gig workers, considering recent developments
Conversely, The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that 5 (this bears monitoring), amid market uncertainty. 2 million adults will lose Medicaid due to work requirement restrictions
Furthermore, Nevertheless, The second rollout of Medicaid changes won’t begin until 2028, but those are the deepest cuts, in today's financial world
At the same time, Visions include new cost-sharing charges between states and low-income working enrollees for certain health care services, considering recent developments
The changes also require states to end non-Medicaid health care coverage for immigrants, considering recent developments
Conversely, A June 24 assessment by the Congressional Budget Office jects that as a result of all the changes to Medicaid and the ACA (more on that below), apximately 12 million will lose health care coverage
People who have health coverage through ACA marketplaces Changes to ACA requirements and subsidies could result in 8. 2 million people losing health care coverage through ACA marketplaces, according to CBO estimates (something worth watching)
The first set of changes are stricter requirements: Those who access health care through the ACA marketplace face new annual conditions for income and immigration
They’ll also face a shorter window to enroll each year
The most significant impact is what’s missing from the bill: An extension of the enhanced premium tax credits for ACA marketplace coverage, put in place during the pandemic, which expire at the end of the year, given current economic conditions
Premium tax credits are a federal subsidy that helps cover monthly premium costs for those who purchase health insurance through the ACA marketplace
If enhanced tax credits expire, out-of-pocket premiums in the marketplace could increase by more than 75% and up to 90% in rural areas, according to KFF CEO Drew Altman, during the press call
He also said that enrollment could drop as much as 50% in rural areas
Levitt added that the measures in the bill amount to “what is effectively a partial repeal of the ACA," which passed 15 years ago
Additionally, Federal data shows an estimated 45 million people are enrolled in health coverage through the ACA — 13% of the U
Furthermore, Population
However, State health grams and rural hospitals Federal cuts to Medicaid and the ACA will shift financial responsibilities onto states, which is ly to add financial strain to state health grams and hospitals — particularly community health centers and rural hospitals
For decades, states have used vider taxes to help fund Medicaid and state-directed payments
Additionally, Nevertheless, The bill limits how states can do so
Robin Rudowitz, vice president at KFF and director of the gram on Medicaid and the Uninsured, said during the press call that if states are limited in how they can use vider taxes, they’ll have to come up with other ways to replace that money increased taxes, cuts to other gram spending or further changes to their Medicaid grams
What the re reveals is cuts would also mean hospitals will receive lower payments, which means hospitals may have to scale back certain services or close altogether
Moreover, Hospitals with low margins, rural hospitals, are ly to face the biggest obstacles
KFF estimates that 12 states with large rural populations and expanded Medicaid could see federal spending on their grams decline by $5 billion or more over 10 years
Kentucky stands to lose $12 billion — the highest among all states (which is quite significant), given current economic conditions
On the other hand, Kentucky, for example, relies heavily on vider taxes, in light of current trends
Kentucky Hospital Association, which represents over 100 hospitals in the state, says the bill’s cuts puts 20,000 people at risk of losing their jobs
A study from University of North Carolina found that 35 rural hospitals in Kentucky could be in danger of closing due to the visions in the bill
What the re reveals is re is one source of hope for rural hospitals in the bill: States may apply to access a $50 billion fund to support rural hospitals, to be distributed for five years beginning in 2027 (remarkable data)
But the fund won’t ly offset the cuts
Levitt said “Delayed relief, even if sizable, won’t arrive fast enough to prevent closures
Moreover, ” People who need food assistanceAs with Medicaid, low-income Americans who are eligible for SNAP will face new work requirements as soon as this year and the effects of funding cuts later in 2028 (something worth watching), given current economic conditions
Additionally, On the other hand, The total reduction in SNAP spending in the bill: $295 billion over the next decade
More than 42 million people receive SNAP benefits, according to the USDA — 12% of the U
However, Meanwhile, It’s worth noting that there are already work requirements built into the SNAP gram — able-bodied people without dependents, ages 18 to 49, must work at least 20 hours per week or 80 hours per month
But the bill raises that upper age limit to 55, which means millions more people will be impacted (something worth watching)
It also eliminates or tightens exemption criteria for states to waive work requirements for certain individuals
However, The issues that SNAP work requirements present remain, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP): increased administrative burdens, more people losing assistance and no imvements in long-term employment outcomes
While food banks don’t directly rely on SNAP to der its services, a loss of SNAP funds could put added pressure on already-strained grams
Ing America, a nationwide network of food banks, estimates the bill’s visions could reduce anywhere from 6 to 9 billion meals annually. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images News via Getty Images) the authorAnna HelhoskiAnna Helhoski is a senior writer/content strategist covering economic news, policy and trends
Her work has been syndicated in national news outlets including The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post and USA Today
See full bio (remarkable data).
Related Articles
More insights from FinancialBooklet