Trump’s threat to fire another Fed member has Wall Street weighing the price of ‘wrecking institutions’ with ‘scapegoat economics’

Economy·Federal ReserveTrump’s threat to fire another Fed member has Wall Street weighing the price of ‘wrecking institutions’ with ‘scapegoat economics’By Eleanor PringleBy Eleanor PringleReporterEleanor PringleReporterEleanor Pringle is an award-winning reporter at Fortune covering news, the economy, and personal finance

Eleanor previously worked as a correspondent and news editor in regional news in the U.K

She her journalism training with the Press Association after earning a degree from the University of East Anglia.SEE FULL BIO President Donald Trump's action has led many investors to question how far the White House's intervention into the Fed will go

Chip Somodevilla - Getty ImagesTrump’s move to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook sparked market volatility and raised alarms over political interference in monetary policy

While UBS’s Paul Donovan told clients the attempt was “completely unprecedented,” Wharton’s Jeremy Siegel argued her ousting adds “noise but little substance” compared with the Fed’s longer-term policy pivots. are shuddering this morning after President Trump announced his plan to fire another member of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)

While some supporters may argue the case of accountability for Fed voting members, many on Wall Street are chalking this up to further meddling by the White House

Yesterday President Trump said he had “removed” Fed Governor Lisa Cook from her position, alleging “there is sufficient reason to believe [Cook] may have made false statements on one or more mortgage agreements.” The move came after Bill Pulte, the head of the agency that regulates mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a Trump appointee, alleged on social media site X that Cook had claimed two primary residences (in Ann Arbor, Michigan and Atlanta) in 2021 in order to secure better mortgage terms

Cook hit back at the questions, saying in a statement: “I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet.” However, she added: “I do intend to take any questions my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and vide the facts.” To remove Cook from her seat is to present the White House with an opportunity: To replace her with a more dovish economist, open to President Trump’s way of thinking on monetary policy

Indeed, it has angered Trump so much that he has threatened to fire Jerome Powell for his “Too Late” apach to the base rate

Trump also celebrated when a further member of the FOMC, Adriana Kugler, resigned earlier this summer and opened up a spot for a Trump-nominated member

The battle between the White House and the Fed (arguably one-sided, as the Fed tries to steer well- of ) means many analysts position the action from Trump as further intervention into the central bank—the autonomy of which is highly valued by financial institutions around the world

The legality of the firing remains questionable, UBS’s Paul Donovan told clients this morning, adding: “The attempt is completely unprecedented

In the context of recent s from Trump, whether or not the president believes the action to be justified is irrelevant

Investors cannot but conclude that this is a planned assault of the independence of the Federal Reserve.” There are obstacles to the firing, Donovan points out, in that Trump has already appointed the majority of Fed governors including its chair, and the “Fed’s policy has been independent, until now.” Moreover: “If the dismissal holds up in the courts, the Senate does have to confirm a successor

The FOMC contains regional fed presidents who can strive for an independent policy, and faith in these checks may limit the negative market reaction in the near term

That being said, the decline largely reversed in the hours ing

Skanda Amarnath, the executive director of Employ America and a former Fed economist, told Fortune: “Wrecking institutions with unlawful behavior and pathetic power grabs come with costs to Americans

The dollar continues to weaken as American governance continues to erode

That means higher prices for all commodities

Chair Powell must ensure that Lisa Cook is not removed as a result of these arbitrary and capricious actions from the president.” At the other end of the spectrum, Wharton’s fessor Jeremy Siegel sees the debate over Cook’s position as a shorter-term headline as opposed to a more important economic fundamental: The path of America’s monetary policy in the longer term

Powell’s speech at Jackson Hole, Siegel wrote for WisdomTree where he is senior economist, “was a per and long overdue pivot.” He continued: “Politically, the situation around … Cook adds noise but little substance

Her potential ouster, or replacement, won’t materially alter policy, especially now that Powell has signaled his intent. “Trump’s influence may loom large in public discourse, but operationally, the Fed has already turned the corner

The more important question is whether Powell will cut fast enough to satisfy political demands

Explore this year's list.