Tesla board blocks shareholder vote on policy that would ban political statements by CEO Elon Musk and other executives
Investment
Fortune

Tesla board blocks shareholder vote on policy that would ban political statements by CEO Elon Musk and other executives

Why This Matters

The SEC has sided with Tesla’s board in a dispute over a shareholder proposal seeking political neutrality among Tesla executives and board members.

September 16, 2025
10:09 PM
5 min read
AI Enhanced

·TeslaTesla board blocks holder vote on policy that would ban political statements by CEO Elon Musk and other executivesBy Amanda GerutBy Amanda GerutNews Editor, West CoastAmanda GerutNews Editor, West CoastAmanda Gerut is the west coast editor at Fortune, overseeing publicly traded es, executive compensation, Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, and investigations.SEE FULL BIO Donald Trump and Elon Musk, whose alliance helped shape the 2024 election.

Photo by ALEX WROBLEWSKI,ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty ImagesThe Tesla board has managed to avoid what could have been a tricky investor vote on requiring political neutrality among executives, after the Securities and Exchange Commission ruled the electric vehicle manufacturer could exclude a holder posal on the matter from its 2025 annual materials, according to a copy of the SEC’s letter obtained by Fortune.

The posal was submitted by Jay Butera, 67, a staunch climate advocate and investor who has held s in Tesla since the company’s 2010 IPO.

Butera’s neutrality posal, if apved by holders, would have hibited Tesla leadership from making political statements, endorsements, or contributions in support or opposition to political parties or candidates.

Butera, a retired entrepreneur who still holds millions of dollars’ worth of Tesla stock, is a die-hard renewable energy supporter and previously lobbied for the creation of the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus in the House of Representatives in 2016.

Butera said he’s disappointed in the outcome because he thinks the posal would have helped Tesla advance its “mission of accelerating sustainability,” which he views as vital to the world.

He told Fortune he doesn’t want to see the company “jeopardized by unnecessary forays into the endless friction of human .

The Tesla brand, and its mission, should stay above that fray.” “I hope Tesla’s board at least takes note of my posal’s intent and the investor interest in the concept,” Butera wrote in an .

“They can exclude my posal from the ballot on nical grounds, but the issue remains—political perceptions are still harming the Tesla brand, reducing sales, and stressing government relations.

I hope the board will find a way to imve that.” The Tesla board in August sent a letter to the SEC seeking to exclude the posal from its 2025 xy materials without risking an enforcement action from regulators.

most publicly traded companies, the $1.3 trillion EV and robotics company sends xy materials to Tesla holders in advance of its annual meetings each year.

Excluding the posal means investors won’t get a chance to vote on it at the upcoming meeting in November.

However, some Tesla investors have been hoping for the board to more directly address the issue.

Retail, individual investors who hold thousands of s in the company have submitted and upvoted questions related to CEO Elon Musk’s role in —and his time spent on matters pertaining to Tesla—on holder platforms Tesla uses to solicit queries before quarterly earnings calls every quarter since late 2024.

Butera’s posal would have been the first time investors had a chance to vote directly on the issue of and their impact on the EV maker’s .

While the posal doesn’t explicitly mention Musk, the Tesla CEO has been heavily involved in conservative Republican political activity since he donated millions to a Super PAC devoted to advancing President Trump’s 2024 campaign.

After the election, Musk became a fixture at Trump’s side in the Oval Office and at Mar-a-Lago, and served as a visual emblem of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), frequently appearing in black DOGE baseball caps.

The friendship crescendoed into a thunderous fallout in June, when a feud between Musk and Trump played out on their respective social media platforms, X and Truth Social.

Since then, the two have seemingly severed ties.

The Tesla board argued in its letter to the SEC that the posal sought to “micromanage” the company and that Tesla itself lacks the power or authority to implement such a measure.

In its reply, the commission agreed that the posal was micromanagement and told Tesla it would not recommend any enforcement action if the board omitted it from its xy materials.

It didn’t on the second ng of the board’s argument to exclude the posal.

“In reaching this position, we have not found it necessary to address the alternative basis for omission upon which the Company relies,” the SEC’s review team wrote in a letter to Xuehui Cassie Zhang.

Zhang is the associate general counsel at Tesla. Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for .

“Calling the posal ‘micro-management’ seems ironic because my posal was trying to address a nearly existential blem for the company,” Butera said.

“Hopefully it at least gives pause for management and the board and encourages them to seek their own solutions to the blem.” Tesla’s board told investors in preliminary xy materials that enforcing the tenets of the posed policy could require the company “to violate state laws, including those that limit the ability of a company to regulate the political speech of their employees.” The board included that recommendation in pre-xy materials prior to the SEC’s issuance of its letter.

A definitive xy will soon be distributed to investors and filed publicly.

Butera previously told Fortune he submitted the posal after sending a letter to the board in October 2024 outlining his concerns and not getting a response.

Tesla’s current Code of Ethics asks employees to avoid conflicts of interest that conflicts “may arise whenever your personal interests interfere, or appear to interfere, with Tesla’s interests,” it states.

The code applies to all directors and employees of Tesla and states the “CEO, and all senior financial officers, including the CFO and principal accounting officer, are bound by the visions set forth therein relating to ethical conduct, conflicts of interest and compliance with applicable laws.” Fortune Global Forum returns Oct.

26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of . Apply for an invitation.

FinancialBooklet Analysis

AI-powered insights based on this specific article

Key Insights

  • Earnings performance can signal broader sector health and future investment opportunities
  • Financial sector news can impact lending conditions and capital availability for businesses
  • Consumer sector trends provide insights into economic health and discretionary spending patterns

Questions to Consider

  • Could this earnings performance indicate broader sector trends or company-specific factors?
  • Could this financial sector news affect lending conditions and capital availability?
  • What does this consumer sector news reveal about economic health and spending patterns?

Stay Ahead of the Market

Get weekly insights into market shifts, investment opportunities, and financial analysis delivered to your inbox.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime