
Sam Altman might be right: He’s not the only one who thinks the stock market is in ‘bubble’ territory
Key Takeaways
A company with a chatbot that often gets things wrong is somehow about to become the largest unicorn earth has ever seen. That does feel frothy.
Article Overview
Quick insights and key information
5 min read
Estimated completion
cryptocurrency
Article classification
August 19, 2025
12:28 PM
Fortune
Original publisher
Economy·Sam Altman might be right: He’s not the only one who thinks the stock market is in ‘bubble’ territoryBy Jim EdwardsBy Jim EdwardsExecutive Editor, Global NewsJim EdwardsExecutive Editor, Global NewsJim Edwards is the executive editor for global news at Fortune
He was previously the editor-in-chief of Insider's news division and the founding editor of Insider UK
His investigative journalism has changed the law in two U.S. federal districts and two states
Supreme Court cited his work on the death penalty in the concurrence to Baze v
Rees, the ruling on whether lethal injection is cruel or unusual
He also won the Neal award for an investigation of bribes and kickbacks on Madison Avenue.SEE FULL BIO CEO of OpenAI Sam Altman at the Sun Valley Lodge for the Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference on July 8, 2025, in Sun Valley, Idaho.Sam Altman may be right to say that investors in AI are “overexcited,” but this isn’t a bubble in the tulip mania sense
OpenAI has real revenues ($13 billion) and massive user growth
Still, valuations, especially the Magnificent Seven’s dominance in the S&P 500, look overheated, suggesting a potential correction even if fundamentals remain strong
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said the word “bubble” three times in 15 seconds in a room full of reporters and then urged them not to write a story it—thus ensuring that plenty of stories would be written
He was arguing that investors are “overexcited” by AI
Is he right? From the point of view of nical stock valuations, bably yes
From the point of view of fundamentals, maybe not
A classic bubble exists when the assets being valued are fundamentally not worth their price (and never will be) or when the underlying value is close to zero
So, in the great Dutch “tulip mania” of 1637, it is in hindsight that the price of a tulip bulb should never be equal to 10 times an annual salary
And in the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, it became in hindsight that many mortgages had been given to people who simply didn’t have the ability to afford them, and thus those mortgages were worth far less than banks’ balance sheets said they did
So the question becomes whether AI is a bubble or not right now
From the fundamental point of view, the answer is no
OpenAI isn’t literally worth nothing
It’s not a tulip bulb or a tract in the middle of nowhere
There is a real there
JPMorgan’s Brenda Duverce told clients in a recent note that “OpenAI’s ARR has reached ~$13bn (up 30% from Jun-25), and the company has reported it is on track to reach 700mn weekly active users (up 40% from Mar-25), while surpassing 5mn paying users (up 66% from Jun-25).” She also noted that a “secondary market transaction that could push the company’s valuation to $500bn, up from the previously cited $300bn post-money figure from Mar-25, which would make OpenAI the most valuable private company in the world.” To put that bluntly, a company with a chatbot that often gets things wrong is somehow to become the largest unicorn earth has ever seen
That does feel frothy
But OpenAI isn’t worth nothing: $13 billion in revenues is a real thing
Maybe the value of its equity will decline in the short term but the company isn’t teetering the way Lehman Brothers was in 2007
But how the nical point of view? There is a lot of chatter on Wall Street right now whether stocks are overvalued in a way that looks a bubble
They have some scary charts! Here is a real head-scratcher: The contribution to U.S
GDP growth from data center spending is now the same as that from consumer spending, according to Apollo Management
The obvious blem with that: This state of affairs exists because consumers have reduced their spending habits as data spending has increased
Unless data centers suddenly start buying cars or shopping at Depot, this isn’t good for the long run
It’s especially not good because the run-up in value of stocks is now overpowering the rest of the S&P 500
John Authers of Bloomberg wrote this morning, “It’s unheard of for 2% of the index’s companies to account for virtually 40% of its value.” And here is a chart from Bespoke Investment Group
It shows the performance since 2015 of the Magnificent Seven companies vs. the rest of the market. “Bloomberg’s Mag 7 index vs. its 500 Ex Mag 7 index is pretty unbelievable
You can barely see the ‘Ex Mag 7’s’ 129% gain because of how much the 2,800% gain for the Mag 7 overshadows it,” the company says: Goldman Sachs’ David Kostin has reportedly said that the Mag 7 stocks grew their earnings per in Q2 by 26% year on year
So there is real money fueling a real there
The partial conclusion must be: This isn’t a bubble of fundamentals
No one thinks AI is made of tulips
But it does look a lot some stocks are nically overvalued, and it should not surprise anyone if this “bubble” bursts
Here’s a snapshot of the action prior to the opening bell in New York: S&P 500 futures were flat this morning, premarket, after the index closed flat yesterday near its record high
STOXX Europe 600 was up 0.54% in early trading
The U.K.’s FTSE 100 was up 0.31% in early trading
Japan’s Nikkei 225 was down 0.38% to hit another record high
China’s CSI 300 was down 0.38%
The South Korea KOSPI was down 0.81%
India’s Nifty 50 was up 0.42% before the end of the session
Bitcoin fell to $114.9K.Introducing the 2025 Fortune Global 500, the definitive ranking of the biggest companies in the world
Explore this year's list.
Related Articles
More insights from FinancialBooklet