
Perplexity, the $18 billion AI ‘answer machine,’ wants to play nice with news publishers. They keep suing it anyway
Key Takeaways
Perplexity is facing copyright lawsuits from publishers around the world, even as it tries to forge partnerships with them.
Article Overview
Quick insights and key information
5 min read
Estimated completion
investment
Article classification
August 26, 2025
03:59 PM
Fortune
Original publisher
AI·PerplexityPerplexity, the $18 billion AI ‘answer machine’, wants to play nice with news publishers
They keep suing it anywayBy Beatrice NolanBy Beatrice NolanReporterBeatrice NolanReporterBeatrice Nolan is a reporter at Fortune covering
Beatrice previously worked as a reporter at Insider, covering stories AI and Big
She's based in Fortune's London office and graduated from the University of York with a bachelor's degree in English.SEE FULL BIO Perplexity is facing a wave of copyright lawsuits from publishers around the world.AI engine Perplexity is facing a new headache amid its fraught relationship with publishers: another copyright lawsuit
The suit is filed on behalf of two of Japan’s largest media groups, Nikkei and Asahi Shimbun, and accuses the company of copying and storing article content and ignoring a “nical measure” designed to prevent this from happening
The media groups are seeking damages of ¥2.2bn ($15mn) each
The lawsuit is a setback to the AI engine’s efforts to play nice with online publishers, especially media organizations, whose content it heavily relies on to duce its AI answers
Perplexity’s AI-powered “answer machine” crawls websites to access content, then uses that material to generate concise answers for users that include citations
The answers summarize information from multiple sources, including news
Many news publishers however worry that the rise of AI engines such as Perplexity could be an existential threat to the industry, diverting audiences away from their websites and undermining their advertising and subscription models
To try and assuage some of these concerns, Perplexity has signed revenue-sharing partnerships with outlets including Fortune, Time, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, and the Los Angeles Times, and has mised to give partner organizations access to its enterprise tools to build their own AI ducts
Perplexity also recently launched a gram allowing publishers to revenue generated from their content through its Comet web browser and AI assistant
The startup has allocated $42.5 million for the initiative, with publishers receiving 80% of revenue from a new subscription tier, Comet Plus
Publishers will earn money when their drive traffic through Comet, appear in queries, or assist users via the AI assistant
Allegations of ignoring no-crawling signs Perplexity, which was founded in 2022, was last valued at $18 billion in a July funding round
The company regularly speaks of the importance of journalism for its duct
Jessica Chan, the company’s head of publishing partnerships, previously told Fortune that the company needs a “thriving journalism and digital publishing ecosystem” and “continual duction” of journalistic information to succeed. “There is really no world in which Perplexity is successful but publishers are not,” she said
However, these efforts haven’t managed to prevent a growing list of media companies from pursuing legal action against the AI startup
Perplexity has faced legal threats from the BBC for scraping and verbatim use of content without consent, as well as Forbes and Wired for republishing prietary content without citation
It’s also currently battling a copyright suit from News Corp’sDow Jones and The New York Post
Just last week, the company failed to convince a New York federal court to dismiss or transfer the News Corp lawsuit
The News Corp case and the lawsuit brought by Nikkei and Asahi make similar claims but will be assessed under different copyright law
In Japan, AI training on existing copyrighted works is partially permitted, but restrictions apply when content is copied or stored without consent or when publishers’ nical safeguards are ignored
In contrast, U.S. copyright law generally offers stronger tections for publishers, with courts scrutinizing reduction and commercial use of content
Nikkei and Asahi’s lawsuit also claims that Perplexity has damaged the papers’ credibility by viding incorrect summaries and information falsely attributed to the newspapers’ , violating the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, a Japanese law that hibits various forms of unfair competition to ensure fair practices in the market and tect es from misconduct such as misleading advertising
In a statement d with the Financial Times, which is owned by Nikkei, the financial newspaper accused the company of “’free riding’ on article content that journalists from both companies have spent immense time and effort to re and write,” while paying no compensation
The claim also includes allegations that, in copying and storing news , Perplexity ignored nical safeguards the “robots.txt” code used by websites to signal whether their data can or cannot be scraped by automated crawlers; Perplexity says it respects these request, though a 2024 report in Wired found Perplexity may have violated its pledge by using undisclosed IP addresses to access content from sites that had opted out of being scraped
The crawling issue has also caused friction between Cloudflare and Perplexity
The cybersecurity company has also alleged that Perplexity is bypassing websites’ no-crawling requests by disguising its identity, making it appear as though the traffic is coming from a different source
Cloudflare investigated the AI startup after customers reported that Perplexity was ignoring robots.txt directives
Perplexity did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for
Introducing the 2025 Fortune Global 500, the definitive ranking of the biggest companies in the world
Explore this year's list.
Related Articles
More insights from FinancialBooklet