GOP bill cutting $9 billion in approved funding includes full amount public broadcasting was to receive for next 2 years
Key Takeaways
The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense.
Article Overview
Quick insights and key information
4 min read
Estimated completion
personal finance
Article classification
July 18, 2025
09:05 AM
Fortune
Original publisher
·government spendingGOP bill cutting $9 billion in apved funding includes full amount public broadcasting was to receive for next 2 yearsBy Kevin FrekingBy The Associated PressBy Kevin FrekingBy The Associated Press Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La. , leaves the chamber at the Capitol in Washington, on July 17, 2025
Furthermore, Scott Applewhite—APThe Republican-led Congress has passed President Donald Trump’s request to claw back $9 billion in public broadcasting and foreign aid spending
Trump’s Republican administration is employing a rarely used tool that allows the president to transmit a request to cancel previously apved funding authority
Meanwhile, Democrats tried to kill the measure but needed more Republicans uncomfortable with the president’s effort to join them
The Senate apved the vast majority of Trump’s request in the early morning hours Thursday, 51-48
The House ed suit early Friday, 216-213
The measure now goes to the president to be signed into law
Furthermore, Here’s a closer look at what’s in the bill: Public media on the chopping block Trump asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1
Additionally, 1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount it’s due to receive during the next two budget years (an important development)
Additionally, The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense (something worth watching)
What the re reveals is corporation distributes more than 70% of the money to more than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service to support national gramming
Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said public broadcasting has been taken over by “partisan activists. ” Still, the potential fallout from the cuts for local public media stations generated concerns on both sides of the political aisle
Nevertheless, Nevertheless, Mike Rounds, R-S. , said he secured a deal from the White House that some funding administered by the Interior Department would be repurposed to subsidize Native American public radio stations in a dozen states
But many lawmakers say that won’t help a large number of local broadcasting stations
Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis. , unsuccessfully sought to take out the public broadcasting cuts
Nevertheless, Nevertheless, “If we don’t adopt this amendment, local television and radio stations will shut down and it will be rural stations that will be the first to close,” Baldwin said
To justify the spending cuts, the Trump administration and Republican lawmakers cited certain activities they disagree with to portray a wide range of a gram’s funding as wasteful
On the other hand, Nevertheless, In recent testimony, Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought criticized gramming aimed at fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion, given the current landscape
On the other hand, Additionally, He said NPR aired a 2022 gram entitled “What ‘Queer Ducks’ can teach teenagers sexuality in the animal kingdom. ” He also cited a special town hall that CNN held in 2020 with “Sesame Street” combating racism
Targeting humanitarian aid As part of the package, Trump asked lawmakers to rescind almost $8. 3 billion in foreign aid grams that aim to fight famine and disease and mote global stability
A Senate amendment knocked the foreign aid cuts down to $7. 9 billion when Republicans agreed to remove what would have been a $400 million cut to PEPFAR, the politically gram that began under President George W
Bush to combat HIV/AIDS
Additionally, The gram is credited with saving millions of s, in today's market environment
Among the rescissions in the bill: $500 million of the $4 billion appriated for global health grams funding activities to combat infectious diseases and mote maternal health, amid market uncertainty
Conversely, $800 million for a gram that vides emergency shelter, water and sanitation and family reunification for those forced to flee their own country. 15 billion for two grams designed to boost the economies and democratic institutions in and strategically important countries (an important development). $496 million to vide humanitarian assistance such as food, water and health care for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. $361 million for international peacekeeping efforts, which are designed to stabilize conflict zones and tect civilians
Nevertheless, The analysis reveals Trump administration also said some cuts, such as eliminating funding for UNICEF, would encourage international organizations to be more efficient and seek contributions from other nations, “putting American taxpayers first, in light of current trends. ” Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive ranking of the biggest companies in America
Conversely, Explore this year's list.
Related Articles
More insights from FinancialBooklet