Former Trump advisor criticizes Trump’s timing on ousting America’s data czar: ‘Like firing the referee’
Business News
Fortune

Former Trump advisor criticizes Trump’s timing on ousting America’s data czar: ‘Like firing the referee’

August 5, 2025
05:05 PM
4 min read
AI Enhanced
economymoneyutilitiesconsumer staplesmarket cyclesseasonal analysispolicy

Key Takeaways

After a historic downward revision to jobs numbers, Trump fired the head of the BLS. But critics on both sides say the move won’t fix deeper problems with jobs data.

Article Overview

Quick insights and key information

Reading Time

4 min read

Estimated completion

Category

business news

Article classification

Published

August 5, 2025

05:05 PM

Source

Fortune

Original publisher

Key Topics
economymoneyutilitiesconsumer staplesmarket cyclesseasonal analysispolicy

Economy·Donald TrumpFormer Trump advisor criticizes Trump’s timing on ousting America’s data czar: ‘ firing the referee’By Eva RoytburgBy Eva Roytburg Stephen Moore, while disagreeing that the numbers were manipulated, concurred with Trump that the BLS needs a new “Mr

Fix-It” to head the bureau

Andrew Harrer / Bloomberg—Getty ImagesPresident Donald Trump’s decision to fire Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), last Friday after a dismal jobs report is drawing criticism not just from his usual opponents, but also from his allies

Stephen Moore, President Donald Trump’s former economic advisor, told Fortune that firing McEntarfer when he did was akin to “firing the referee because you don’t the way the game turned out.” “I’m not here to defend Trump,” Moore, who was also Trump’s onetime nominee to serve as a Federal Reserve Governor, added. “But I do think he should have fired her a long time ago, because the numbers that have been coming out now for the last several years have just not been an accurate gauge as to what’s really going on in the economy.” Trump became incensed with McEntarfer after the new report significantly revised U.S. jobs figures from May and June, slashing some 258,000 jobs combined for those months

The revision constitutes the largest downward revision to the jobs numbers in almost 60 years

The president wrote in a Truth Social post Friday that McEntarfer, a Biden administration appointee, “manipulated” and “faked” the jobs report numbers for political gain

He said he would replace her with someone “more competent.” Transitioning away from survey data Moore, while disagreeing that the numbers were manipulated, concurred with Trump that the BLS needs a new “Mr

Fix-It” to head the bureau

He said that in his 40 years of working in economic re, he had never seen the jobs numbers become so unreliable

Recent economic data is plagued by the same issue as political polling data: Nobody wants to pick up the phone anymore, Moore said

The monthly jobs report relies heavily on surveys of es and households, which worked when everyone used landline phones, but is less reliable in the digital age. “The cedures the BLS is using are 75 years old,” Moore added. “They need to be completely revamped.” The pandemic appears to have accelerated the trend of people ignoring pollers’ calls

Before 2020, response rates to the Current Employment Statistics surveys—which the BLS uses to compile the monthly jobs report—hovered around 60%

It has since declined to 45%

Days before Trump fired McEntarfer, a bipartisan group of economists—including Nobel Laureate Paul Romer—wrote a letter to Congress asking for funding to modernize the data-collection cess

Agencies need the space and money to “restore” survey response rates, while also experimenting with new means of data collection, the economists argued. “Transitioning to a system in which less survey data is bl with more administrative and private sector data, while preserving data integrity and privacy standards, is the generationally important task facing statistical agencies today,” the economists wrote

However, reers at the San Francisco Federal Reserve, who studied survey responsiveness earlier this year, found that while declining response rates present concerns for the reliability of data, it didn’t necessarily lead to larger-than-average revisions to reports the monthly jobs report

Claire Mersol, an economist at BLS, told the Wall Street Journal that much of the revisions done to the previous numbers were part of “routine recalculation of seasonal factors.” “Typically, the monthly revisions have offsetting movements within industries—one goes up, one goes down,” Mersol said. “In June, most revisions were negative.” In other words, the sharply negative revisions could have just been chance

Even if the data has become more unreliable, some Republican allies of the president said that firing the head of the BLS would do little to fix the blem

Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, told NBC News that he questioned how the move would imve BLS’ accuracy. “I’m going to look into it, but first impression is that you can’t really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting,” he said

Lisa Murkowski from Alaska said that she doesn’t trust the numbers, but the move makes it worse. “And when you fire people, then it makes people trust them even less,” she said

Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive ranking of the biggest companies in America

Explore this year's list.