
America's Newest Space IPO Was a Smashing Success
Key Takeaways
Sometimes, it's better to be lucky than good. As the old saying goes, "Sometimes, it's better to be lucky than to be good. " Take investors in the Voyager nologies...
Article Overview
Quick insights and key information
5 min read
Estimated completion
investment
Article classification
June 28, 2025
07:07 AM
The Motley Fool
Original publisher
Sometimes, it's better to be lucky than good
As the old saying goes, "Sometimes, it's better to be lucky than to be good. " Take investors in the Voyager nologies (VOYG -14. 26%) initial public offering (IPO), for example
Once upon a time, space stocks were a rarity
So much so that Sir Richard Branson was able to IPO Virgin Galactic as the only real way for investors to "dabble a little bit in a spaceship company, own a little bit of a spaceship company" -- and watch the stock price zoom into orbit
Virgin's success soon inspired a wave of imitators -- special-purpose acquisition companies (SPAC) that dutifully zoomed when first created, only to crater thereafter, frightening many investors away from the idea of in space stocks for years
That all changed, however, when President Donald Trump won his second term of office, mising to bring Elon Musk into government and invest heavily in space exploration
Space stocks zoomed once again, sending the prices of companies Redwire (RDW -4. 95%), BlackSky (BKSY -4. 83%), and Rocket Lab (RKLB -1. 99%) to the Moon earlier this year
Image source: Getty Images
It was at this pitious moment in time that Voyager nologies decided it, too, would go public
Wooing investors with mises to build an international coalition of companies and create a new, privately owned space station to replace the International Space Station (ISS), Voyager stock debuted to widespread acclaim on June 11
Expected to price as low as $26 a (and actually pricing at $31), Voyager opened its first day of trading at $69. 75 -- more than twice the expected price
Even falling to close at $56 and change, it's hard to call Voyager's IPO anything but a smashing success
If you got in anywhere near the IPO price, you were lucky indeed
Momentum only lasts so long But what if you were not among those lucky few who got in at the IPO price
Well, in that case, I'd say you're bably feeling a bit less fortunate
The first 10 trading days since Voyager's IPO have not been kind to momentum investors
Seeking a rocket ride "to the moon," they instead have found themselves on an elevator slowly descending to Earth
By close of trading last Friday, for example, Voyager stock had given up much of its IPO price gains and fallen to close within pennies of $43 a
Again, a nice fit if you were lucky enough to get in on the ground floor
But a significant loss if you didn't
Invest in fundamentals, not momentum Now, on the flip side, Voyager's steeply fallen stock price does give investors, who didn't get in at the IPO price, a second bite at the apple and a chance to buy into the stock at a bit more than its price immediately post-IPO (it was trading at $48. 25 a at Friday's open)
But should you even want to
Let's run a few numbers and see if an answer arises
Let's begin with the basics: Voyager nologies is a $2. 5 billion small-cap aerospace and defense contractor
Best known for its role leading a conium of companies building the Starlab space station, Voyager actually gets only half its revenue ($75 million last year) from space activities
The other half ($78 million) comes from "defense and national security" ducts, including "artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled edge computing platforms and missile pulsion modules. " Neither half of Voyager is currently fitable according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), however
Indeed, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence, Voyager reported $74 million in net losses last year -- losing $0. 50 for every $1 in ducts it sold
The company's also burning cash at an even higher rate, with free cash flow running negative to the tune of more than $125 million last year (nearly 70% worse than the GAAP numbers make it seem)
The upshot for would-be Voyager stock investors With no Wall Street analysts yet publishing earnings forecasts for Voyager, it's hard for an investor to know when Voyager might eventually turn fitable
But here's my two cents: With Voyager currently working full tilt to build the Starlab space station, management forecasting that the station will cost "apximately $2. 8 billion to $3. 3 billion" to build, and Voyager hoping to launch the station aboard a SpaceX Starship rocket (which hasn't yet been certified for flight) in 2029, the absolute earliest anyone should expect to see Voyager turn a fit is 2029
Most ly, it will take some time after the first launch before Starlab begins raking in enough revenue to help Voyager turn a fit
Most definitely, the company won't be able to get anywhere near fitability before Starlab is launched
Long story short, that means Voyager will spend the next several years deeply unfitable as it spends hand over fist to build its multibillion-dollar space station
Whether the situation then imves after the station is built is anyone's guess
Rich Smith has positions in Rocket Lab
The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Rocket Lab and S&P Global
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Related Articles
More insights from FinancialBooklet