$148,153 vs. $38,176: Which Number Matters Most From Recent Retirement Savings Report?
Investment
The Motley Fool

$148,153 vs. $38,176: Which Number Matters Most From Recent Retirement Savings Report?

July 27, 2025
04:36 AM
6 min read
AI Enhanced
moneyfinancialtechnologyhealthcaremarketdata analysiseconomic indicators

Key Takeaways

Neither of these two numbers is necessarily the yardstick you'll want to measure your own progress against.

Article Overview

Quick insights and key information

Reading Time

6 min read

Estimated completion

Category

investment

Article classification

Published

July 27, 2025

04:36 AM

Source

The Motley Fool

Original publisher

Key Topics
moneyfinancialtechnologyhealthcaremarketdata analysiseconomic indicators

How much does the typical American have d up for retirement

Additionally, It's a simple question -- but there's not a simple answer (which is quite significant)

The mathematical average of everyone's retirement account values may seem a fair way to come up with a figure, in this volatile climate

How -- and how widely -- all of the underlying numbers used in the calculation of this average are dispersed, however, leads to a misleading result, in today's market environment

Furthermore, Namely, it's much, much more than the majority of Americans actually have tucked away

Never even mind that older Americans should (and broadly speaking, do) have more d than younger people

This analysis suggests that y've had more time to accumulate and grow their nest eggs, after all (an important development)

That's why when Vanguard published its "How America s 2025" report in June, it offered two different benchmark figures for a range of ages

One is the mathematical average, or mean, while the other is the median, or midpoint amount

But which (if either) should you personally worry the most

Nevertheless, The difference between the two numbers Vanguard operates a wide family of mutual funds, and also serves as the administrator for a huge number of corporate retirement plans, given current economic conditions

It's not the only company of its kind: Fidelity and Schwab do the same things, for instance, in today's financial world

But, Vanguard's review of the 4. 8 million retirement plan accounts that it administers does vide a pretty good representation of how all of America s, and its findings will ly be in line with the retirement accounts collectively held by other custodians

Furthermore, So just how much do Americans have d up for their retirements

Moreover, As of the end of last year, the average workplace retirement account's value stood at $148,153, but the median was a much more modest $38,176

As a refresher, an average is the sum total of all the numbers in a data set that's then divided by the number of distinct data inputs used to come up with the sum (noteworthy indeed)

That usually makes it a meaningful big-picture snapshot

This's different than a median

The data indicates that median is simply the value of the number found at the very middle or midpoint of a size-sequenced/ranked series of numbers (quite telling), considering recent developments

In other words, in the case of the set made up of Vanguard's workplace retirement accounts, half of them had more money in them than the mean of $38,176, while the other half had less

This raises the question: How is the average so much bigger than the median number

The answer is that a relatively small number of these retirement accounts have unusually large amounts of money in them, which skews the average upward

Although Vanguard doesn't offer a great deal of detail on this dynamic, it does note that only 16% of its retirement plan accounts are worth more than $250,000, while 28% are worth less than $10,000

Which figures should matter to you

The bigger question remains, though: Which of the two numbers means the most to you, given current economic conditions

On the other hand, The answer is neither, in today's financial world

Nevertheless, Comparing yourself as an investor to other investors is a tricky

Meanwhile, There's always more to the story

This leads to the conclusion that re may be a significant inheritance on someone else's radar (or yours), for example

Some of these investors may have more than one retirement account, and not all of those may be in Vanguard's care

Nevertheless, Some people have been lucky enough to work for unusually generous employers that contribute more to their workers' 401(k) accounts than the employees do themselves, in today's market environment

Comparing their situations to yours isn't fair or meaningful

Conversely, Then there are the age differences among all the workers that Vanguard's 2025 savings study is considering

While the overall average may be $148,153, for the 25-to-34-year-olds in this pool, the mean is a mere $42,650

Additionally, For the 65-and-up crowd, the average is just under $300,000, in light of current trends

Additionally, Meanwhile, the median numbers for these two groups at opposite ends of the adult age spectrum are $16,255 and $95,425, respectively

Image source: Getty Images

Furthermore, So how do you know how you're doing for you

Well, that's just it -- you don't

Nevertheless, Your personal yardstick could be anywhere in between these figures, although realistically speaking, almost everyone arguably will need significantly more than any of these amounts to secure a comfortable retirement (remarkable data)

Furthermore, Insurer Northwestern Mutual reports that Americans believe they will need an average of $1. 26 million in their nest eggs when they reach retirement to comfortably though their golden years

Given what we know Social Security, and the amount of annual income a person could reasonably withdraw from a stash of this size over 30 years or so without completely depleting it, that number is arguably in the right ballpark (this bears monitoring), given current economic conditions

Additionally, Most people, of course, never get anywhere close to this amount

However, You can still enjoy your retirement with less (fascinating analysis)

Nevertheless, In contrast, Focus on the cess at least as much as you focus on the numbers The irony

Additionally, While most people are worrying the collective-but-misleading numbers, they're not focused enough on the important things they can control

The cess of saving itself (something worth watching)

However, Any goal is better than no goal at all, in today's financial world

Additionally, People with goals tend to achieve better results than people without them

And once you've set a goal for a specific target date -- say, retiring when you turn 67 -- you can then work your way backwards from it and figure out how much you need to between now and then, and determine how much your retirement portfolio needs to grow in the meantime

In contrast, Taking deliberate and decisive actions in the meantime, even without a specific goal in mind, will also help you achieve a worthy result

Additionally, For example, if you habitually and reliably invest 15% of your annual salary into a market-tracking index fund for at least 30 years, you will ly be able to maintain your standard of living after you retire, in today's market environment

Yes, that may require some serious scrimping and saving, and you can't know for sure how big your nest egg will be at the end of that time frame

You can at least control the cess, though, even if you can't precisely control the outcome

So, focus on the cess and trust that the stock market's future over the long haul will look something its history

All the same, though, you might want to aim to do better than any of Vanguard's median and average retirement savings figures for your particular age bracket, considering recent developments

None of those numbers put you on track to fund the of retirement you're ly dreaming of.